Psychosocial Administration of Bipolar Ailment: Methodology of Performing a Systematic Evaluation

This report is deliberately divided in to subsections to explore the subject carefully and systematically.


In this write-up the author information how a researcher ought to perform a systematic critique of bipolar disorder. This will assist future reviewers to carry out their evaluations according to the most scientific benchmarks of the working day.

Critique Strategies

In contrast to a narrative critique, the writer provides a summary of randomized controlled trials on the specific and concentrated clinical issue of the review, applying express strategies to search, critically appraise, and synthesized the literature systematically. He brings jointly a variety of individually performed reports, irrespective of their findings, and synthesis their effects.

The reviewer is perfectly mindful of the desired rigor in the preparation of a systematic review and conducts a formal approach for this reason. This features a extensive and systematic search for principal studies on the focused concern, adopted by selection of scientific studies using distinct and reproducible eligibility criteria, vital quality appraisal of primary scientific tests, and ultimately synthesis of outcomes according to predetermined and explicit approaches.

Aims and targets

The writer endeavors to take a look at the effectiveness of different kinds of adjunct psychosocial interventions in administration of bipolar affective ailment, utilizing an explicit a priori methodology in accordance to a standard critique protocol.

A protocol was created to reduce bias, by getting all vital methodological conclusions plainly and systematically, in advance of going to the literature. The protocol aimed to established out the jobs and obvious and explicit techniques to be followed in this systematic assessment and to ensure that results are reproducible.

Targeted query: Are diverse techniques of adjunct psychosocial administration for men and women with bipolar dysfunction useful, helpful and excellent to typical healthcare treatment solo, in relapse avoidance, useful enhancement, and reduction of severity and period of bipolar episodes?

Definition of psychosocial management for the purpose of conducting a systematic assessment: Psychosocial administration is an umbrella expression made use of to include different varieties of psychological therapies utilized in the management of bipolar disorder. This includes cognitive therapy, family targeted treatment, interpersonal and social rhythm remedy, psycho-education and learning, and relapse avoidance. The creator contains studies in which some of the subsequent aspects were deemed:

1) Schooling about the ailment: All types of studies integrated need to have offered normal education to the topics of the examine intervention arm, in get to increase the individual’s consciousness and comprehending of bipolar disorder.

2) Checking and self regulation: Monitoring, vigilance, identification and management of acute signs or symptoms and relapse prevention should have been portion of
the agenda for the intervention arm. Individual’s skill to figure out and manage the relapse prodromes or the interior and external stressors that may well improve their vulnerability to foreseeable future relapse ought to have been discussed.

3) Improvement of adherence to pharmacotherapy: Among the the integrated scientific studies, forming a therapeutic alliance with the psychiatrist and relevance of adherence to pharmacotherapy should really have been mentioned to the remedy team. Administration of facet results, and execs and drawbacks of clinical remedy and hazards of abrupt therapy withdrawal really should have been mentioned.

4) Cognitive procedures in bipolar disorder need to have been talked about with the intervention arm of integrated scientific tests. This could include things like education and learning on tactics to check, examine and adjust dysfunctional behaviors and actions associated with undesirable temper repercussions.

5) Scientific tests provided really should have described the information and duration of the psychological treatment for the intervention arm, and have a follow up period of time of at the very least two decades.

6) A least total of 6 periods should really have been sent to the analyze contributors provided in every research.

The over mentioned things are deemed to be integral parts of psychosocial management of bipolar problem. Distinctive treatment method regimes, may give extra bodyweight and emphasis on a person or the other, but it is considered necessary for some of the earlier mentioned factors to be introduced, no make any difference how briefly as a result of the course of remedy offered.

Eligibility conditions with rationales

Style of research

Randomized controlled trials, Nonrandomised and quasi-randomized trials ought to not involved.

Rationale: The reviewers only includes RCTs, for the reason that randomized trials are the gold common of evaluation of usefulness, they make certain random allocation to intervention and manage arms of the scientific tests, help do away with selection bias, and guarantee the similarity in qualities and treatments of the two teams in the extended run, apart from for the intervention less than examine.


1) In all provided research, all people had a prognosis of bipolar ailment I or bipolar dysfunction II, according to explicit diagnostic criteria, determined by structured clinical interviews.

Rationale: To stay clear of bias ensuing from distinctive definitions in between reports the author restricts the evaluate to experiments utilizing DSM IV requirements as the reference conventional for mental ailments.

2) Scientific tests ought to had not entirely recruited individuals who had been struggling from acute mania or patients who were being hospitalized in acute wards at the place of recruitment. Research should have not recruited people with only depressive or manic episodes.

On the other hand, the experiments could include all those attending working day centers. Scientific tests with sufferers with rapid cycling or mixed affective episodes can not be integrated.

Rationale: Reviewers should try out to include things like scientific tests exactly where the recruited patients, existing with related scientific picture and have to have very similar type of support and therapy. The teams that slide underneath exclusion requirements mentioned over have diverse wants, severity of illness and compliance to the intervention delivered.

3) Studies may well include individuals with gentle levels of melancholy (outlined as a Beck depression inventory of <15) can be included.

Rationale:This group of patients can benefit from therapies provided and be able to comply with the treatment.

4) Patients on both arms of the included studies should be on regular prophylactic medication.

Rationale: Standard prophylactic pharmacotherapy is the mainstay of treatment of bipolar disorder and it is considered unethical to interrupt medical treatment for experimental purposes. Non-compliance with the medical treatment will significantly change the clinical outcomes of either arm of the study.

5) The included studies only should have trialed adults (between 18 and 65).

Rationale: Studies should include examine the adult age group. The clinical picture, diagnosis and management of childhood bipolar disorder vary significantly from the adult conditions. Older groups commonly have co-morbid physical, mental and cognitive conditions that might introduce confounding to the results and would be very difficult to account for.

6) Studies that mainly focus on patients with other psychiatric co-morbidities or bipolar disorder secondary to organic causes should not be included.

Rationale: The clinical picture, diagnosis, management and complications vary in the above groups.

7) Only studies with patients with a history of at least 2 bipolar episodes and at least one episode within last two years should be included (not in full remission for more than 2 years).

Rationale: A minimum number of 2 episodes ensures diagnostic certainty, and helps avoid first time diagnostic errors to include other mental health conditions such as PTSD and schizophrenia. One episode should be within last 2 years, to ensure that the disease was ongoing at the time of recruitment and the patient was not in full long-term recovery or burnt out phase.

Outcome measures

The included studies should examine some of the following as their outcome measures:

1) Mean number of bipolar episodes and mean number of bipolar related hospitalisation.

2) Time to next episodes (as defined by DSM IV criteria for manic, depressive and mixed episodes).

3) Changes in global functioning and/or duration or severity of bipolar symptoms, using validation instruments.

4) Mean number of days fulfilling the DSM IV diagnosis a bipolar episode.

5) Mean number of episode free days.

6) Mean number of bipolar related days in hospital.

7) Rate of suicide in intervention and control groups.

Search strategy

As the rigour of systematic search methods is an important determinant of unbiased systematic reviews, extended systematic search methods including hand-searching, reference lists, personal communication searching of specialised databases and registries is used by the reviewer to carry out this review.

The search strategy aims at increasing sensitivity of our search, by minimising non-retrieval of the documents that were relevant to the review question and to maximise retrieval of the documents that are relevant to the review respectively.

Every effort should be made for the search to be as extensive as possible. This means that the reviewer may err on the side of retrieval of too many items and subsequently excluding those that are not relevant after direct examination of the papers.

Electronic search

The search terms used in a systematic review are constructed using the following strategy:

1) The reviewer derives major terms from the questions by identifying the population, interventions and outcomes.

2) Alternative spellings and synonyms are identified for major terms. The reviewer also includes terms identified through discussions with experts in the field and subject librarians of mental health trusts.

3) The keywords are checked in any relevant papers available to the reviewer at the outset.

4) The Boolean operator OR is used to incorporate alternative spellings and synonyms.

5) The Boolean operator AND is used to link the major terms from the population, interventions and outcomes.

6) Brackets are used for grouping of terms.

7) Each stage is double checked with a specialist librarian based at mental health library.

The following specified electronic databases have to be searched from inception with the following Mesh terms (or their equivalents in different databases):

(“bipolar disorder” OR “manic depressive psychosis” OR “bipolar depression” OR “manic depression”) Combined with the following subject headings using the Boolean connector AND (Cognitive therapy OR social rhythm therapy OR psycho-education OR family therapy OR family focused therapy OR psychosocial management OR psychosocial intervention OR psychological therapy).

The following free text searches are combined using the Boolean connectors accordingly: (“bipolar disorder*” OR “bipolar depress*” OR “manic depress*” ) AND ( Cognitive therap* OR cognitive behavio* OR social rhythm therap* OR psycho-education OR psychosocial intervention* OR psychosocial management* OR psychosocial treatment OR relapse prevention OR psychological therap* OR psychological management OR psycho-education OR family therap* OR family focus*)

1.The Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Controlled Trials Register (CCDANCTR) will be checked.

2. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) will be checked meticulously according to existing database.

The following additional databases are searched to check the completeness of the review:




4. PsycINFO


Reference checking

The reference lists of all identified randomised controlled trials, other relevant papers and major textbooks of bipolar disorder written in English should be checked. This process will be repeated until no further reports or papers seem relevant, and until no new studies are found that are not already identified electronically.

Hand searching

The journal Bipolar Disorder, will be hand-searched. No further studies should be found though this method which were not already identified among the electronic hits.

Personal Communications

The authors of significant papers are identified from authorship lists over the last two decades. They, and other experts in the field, are contacted and asked of their knowledge of other published or unpublished studies, relevant to this review. No further papers are identified through this process.

Inclusion and exclusion process

Studies scoped by the search strategies elaborated earlier above were checked to ensure satisfaction of both inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Abstracts of all cited studies should be obtained. Studies will be excluded at this stage only if unequivocal evidence is found in the abstracts. When this is not possible full texts of studies are obtained to take a decision regarding exclusion. Excluded studies are recorded with details of the author´s reasons for exclusion.

Share the Post:

Related Posts